> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs-optimism.curiahub.xyz/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs-optimism.curiahub.xyz/citizen-house/citizen-house-proposals.md).

# Citizen House Proposals

## **Proposal Distribution**

<figure><img src="/files/AxEev1R1BjW9Q2FexdWY" alt=""><figcaption></figcaption></figure>

Displays the categorization and distribution of veto proposals, giving insights into how proposals are classified and how frequently each type of veto is used.

## **Results Tracking**

<figure><img src="/files/dMbNNqatjGxCFhZwZzZa" alt=""><figcaption></figcaption></figure>

Analyzes the success rate of proposals, providing metrics that help assess their impact, effectiveness, and acceptance within the community.

## **Table of All Proposals**

<figure><img src="/files/m2EZY11rUJioSGfJkvP8" alt=""><figcaption></figcaption></figure>

**Proposal Name**: Describes the title and key details of each proposal, giving stakeholders an overview of its purpose.

**End Date**: The date by which the voting period for the proposal concludes, indicating the deadline for community participation.

**Status**: Indicates the current state of the proposal.

* **Active**: Proposals that are currently live and available for voting by the community.
* **Ended**: Proposals that have completed their voting period.

**Proposal Result:** Provides an overview of voting outcomes for governance proposals, offering a snapshot of the level of agreement or disagreement among citizens.

* **Veto**: Represents proposals that were vetoed, meaning they were rejected by the governing body.
* **No Veto**: Represents proposals that were accepted without any veto.
* **Others**: This category is used when outcomes fall outside the scope of a straightforward veto or no veto decision.

**Proposal Category**

* **Release**: Proposals focused on issues related to protocol upgrades and the launch of new products or features.
* **Governance**: Proposals that address the structural or procedural aspects of the governance model, seeking improvements or changes.

**Proposal Subcategory**

* **Governance Update**: Changes aimed at refining or modifying existing governance processes to enhance efficiency or fairness.
* **Retro Funding**: Allocations of funds for completed projects or initiatives, often based on retrospective assessment of impact.
* **Protocol Upgrade**: Proposals that suggest technical improvements or changes to the protocol, such as feature updates or optimizations.
* **Governance Upgrade**: Enhancements specifically aimed at the framework and processes of the governance model, aiming to make governance more transparent, participatory, or effective.